Kashinath Ranuba Surase v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Special And Acquisition Officer, Jayakwadi Pro. No.2, A.Bad And An

{1} ca9590.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9590 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 8039 OF 2020 Kashinath Ranuba Surase Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. D. R. Jayabhar, advocate for the Applicant Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 09th January, 2023.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1150 days in fling this appeal.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the same on the ground that there is also circulation delay. Respondentacquiring body, though served, but remained absent. However, considering statutory right of the applicant, the delay of 1150 days stands condoned subject to the condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest

{2} ca9590.22.odt for the aforesaid period of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections if any.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb