← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/1549/2016application allowed

Kholeshwar Gramin Bigar Shetiti Sahakari Patsantha Kashti v. Prakash S/O Tukaram Gaikwad

2016-04-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

criap1549.16 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1549 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.831 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO.35 OF 2016 Kholeshwar Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha, Kashti, through its Recovery Officer ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Prakash s/o Tukaram Gaikwad & anr.

..RESPONDENTS Mr R.R. Karpe, Advocate for applicant;

Mr N.V. Gaware, Advocate for applicant;

Ms R.P. Gaur, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent no.2 CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 28th April, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), subject to applicant furnishing an undertaking that in case if the revision of the respondent no.1-accused is allowed, the applicant - complainant shall deposit the amount withdrawn together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum before this Court within four weeks of such order passed by this Court.

(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) amj

criap1549.16 (2)