Nagar Urban Co Op Bank Ltd Ahmednagar v. Anna Jagannath Gonge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3828 OF 2004 Nagar Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Bank Road, P.B.No.7, Ahmednagar, through its Manager.

...Petitioner.

(Ori. Opponent)

Versus

Anna s/o Jagannath Gonge, Age : Major, Occ : Sweeper C/o. C.V. Datarange, H.No. 427, Devi Lane,

...Respondent

Sangamner, Dist.Ahmednagar.

( Ori.Complainant) ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri L.V. Sangit ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 11th May, 2018.

....

ORAL JUDGMENT :- 1.

The petitioner/appellant has challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 12/12/1994, by which, complaint (ULP) No. 344/1992 filed by the respondent/complainant has been partly allowed and the following directions have been issued by the Labour Court :-

"The respondents are hereby directed to desist from it permanently by continuing the services of the complainant Shri. Anna Jagannath Gone as a Sweeper as was being utilised previously.

The respondents are directed to pay the back wages to the complainant from 26.09.1992 till 30.04.1994 at the rate of Rs.200/- per month."

2.

The petitioner is also aggrieved by judgment of the Industrial Court dated 18/07/2003, by which, revision (ULP) No. 7/1995 has been dismissed.

3.

This Court, while admitting the petition on 17/06/2005, did not grant interim relief to the petitioner. 4.

Learned advocate for the petitioner informs that as there was no interim relief granted by this Court, the bank has implemented the directions of the Labour Court. Though, the respondent was reinstated in service as per the directions of the Labour Court to work for some time, presently he is not in employment of any branch of the petitioner bank. 5.

In the light of above, since the petitioner has already implemented the directions of the Labour Court given in the judgment dated 12/12/1994, I do not find any reason to

cause any interference after a period of 24 years. 6.

Needless to state, in the event of any fresh cause of action, each litigating side is at liberty to seek redressal of its grievances. Rule is discharged.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) shp/-