← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3779/2017disposed offdismissed for default

The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Vikrant Rupendra Kale And Others

2019-08-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat2 pages

C.A. No.3779/2017 (( 1 ))

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3779 OF 2017 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGIATION NO.133 OF 2016 The State of Maharashtra & anr.

...

APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Vikrant Rupendra Kale & ors.

...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for applicant - State Shri A.B. Kale, Advocate for original petitioner Shri S.B. Deshpande, A.S.G. for R.No.1 to 3 in P.I.L. Shri B.R. Surwase, Advocate for R.No.8 & 9 in P.I.L. .....

CORAM:

PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED :

1st AUGUST, 2019.

ORAL ORDER :

The present application was filed with a prayer for dispensing with the personal appearance of the Government official. The concerned Government official was called upon to attend this Court on the backdrop of the fact that in spite of opportunities granted to the State Government, affidavit-in-reply was not filed within reasonable period. The learned Government Pleader submits before this Court that the affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3, 4, 7 and 9 through

C.A. No.3779/2017 (( 2 )) Ms Alka Ahirrao, Superintending Engineer, Administrator of Command Area Development Authority, Ahmednagar. As the affidavit-in-reply is filed in the petition, the learned Government Pleader submits that, the petition would be contested by the State on merits, as well with reference to the affidavit-in-reply filed in this Court.

2.

The purpose for calling upon the Government official and directing the Government official to remain present in this Court is now served. As such, the present Civil Application is disposed of.

(R.G. AVACHAT) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE fmp/-