Seva Sahakari Society Ltd And ORS v. State Of Maha And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 15 WRIT PETITION NO. 4271 OF 2001 PRAKASH DATTATRAYA BHOSALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11041 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4271 OF 2001 MEHBOOB KHAN S/O MUSTAFA KHAN VS.

PRAKASH S/O DATTATRAYA BHOSALE AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11042 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4271 OF 2001 SHAIKH HAROON MOHAMMAD AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11117 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4271 OF 2001 VINOD S/O BHAGWANDAS ZANWAR

VERSUS

PRAKASH S/O DATTATRAYA BHOSALE ...

WITH 18 WRIT PETITION NO. 2063 OF 2003 DATTU DADARAO PHAD

VERSUS

DATTU KISHAN GUTTE AND OTHERS ...

WITH 19 WRIT PETITION NO. 2076 OF 2003 NATHRAO VENKATRAO GUTTE

VERSUS

DATTU KISHAN GUTTE AND OTHERS ...

WITH 21 WRIT PETITION NO. 3973 OF 2003 SEVA SAHAKARI SOCIETY LTD. AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

WITH 22 WRIT PETITION NO. 3983 OF 2003 DNYANOBA NARSAPPA AUTADE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri R. Khandebharad h/f. Shri V. D. Salunke AGP for the Respondent- State : Shri S. P. Tiwari and Shri N. T. Bhagat Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1-4 and 6 in W.P. No. 2063/2003 and W.P. No. 2076/2003 : Shri Kunal Kale h/f. Shri Rajendra Deshmukh ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 06th JULY, 2019.

...

PER COURT :

1.

Learned Advocate Shri Khandebharad holding for Shri V.

D. Salunke on behalf of the petitioners submits, on instructions, that these petitions have been rendered infructuous and can be disposed off.

2.

In view of the above, these petitions are rendered infructuous and stand disposed off. Rule is discharged. 3.

The pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed off.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) shp/-