Sunil Raghunath Deshpande v. Madhav Kale The General Manager (P And R) And Another

- 1 - cp217.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 217 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1309 OF 2020 Sunil S/o Raghunath Deshpande Petitioner

Versus

Mr. Madhav Kale & another Respondents Mr. Sai Joshi, Advocate holding for J. P. Legal Associates for the petitioner.

Mr. Bhausaheb Deshmukh, Advocate for both the respondents. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATE : 30th JUNE, 2022.

PER COURT :

1.

The learned Advocate representing respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that both the respondents have tendered an apology before the Court for having not complied with the directions set out in the judgment dated 26th November, 2021.

2.

It is stated that the order would be complied with within six weeks and there would be no reason for the petitioner to be aggrieved.

- 2 - cp217.22.odt 3.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the statement made on behalf of the respondents be recorded. 4.

As such, this petition is disposed off by recording the statement of both the respondents. The order at issue would be complied with on or before 20th August, 2022. 5.

The respondents are restrained from making any request for extension of time. The non-compliance of this order would amount to aggravated contempt by both the respondents and even if they may be transferred to any other place, they would be held responsible.

( ANIL L. PANSARE ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) Judge Judge dyb