← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3153/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Saujnya Chandrakant Padalwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-03-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3152 OF 2016 Pallavi d/o Raosaheb Puppalwad ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

RESPONDENTS Shri C.A. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No.4 W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.3153 OF 2016 Saujnya d/o Chandrakant Padalwar ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

RESPONDENTS Shri A.S. Bayas, Advocate for respondent No.4 W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.3157 OF 2016

Sunayana d/o Balaji Boinwad ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

RESPONDENTS Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.4 W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.3171 OF 2016 Sarika d/o Gangadhar Anmulwad ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

RESPONDENTS Shri J.R. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.4 W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.3172 OF 2016 Rutuja d/o Kiran Sapkal ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

RESPONDENTS

Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.4

CORAM:

S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATED:

16th March, 2016.

ORAL ORDER :

1.

Issue notice to respondents. Learned A.G.P. waives service for the State. Respective counsel waive service for the respondents.

2.

Mr. Jadhavar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the validation proceedings in respect of the caste/ tribe claim of the petitioners is pending with the Committee since 2013/ 2015. However, the University is not accepting the examination forms of the petitioners of First Year M.B.B.S./ B.A.M.S. Course. The learned counsel for the University submits that, the petitioners are admitted from the reserved category and as such, it is necessary for them to produce the validity certificates.

3.

It is not disputed that the validation proceedings in respect of the caste/ tribe claim of the petitioners is pending with the Committee. It is for the Committee to decide the proceedings. Of course, the petitioners have to co-operate in expeditious disposal of the said proceedings. 4.

Considering the above, we pass the following order. 5.

The Committee shall decide the validation proceedings in respect of caste/ tribe claim of the petitioners expeditiously and preferably within one year from today. The petitioners shall co-operate in expeditious disposal of the said proceedings.

6.

The respondents College and University shall not refuse to accept the examination forms of the petitioners and shall not refrain the petitioners from prosecuting further studies only on the ground that the validation proceedings are pending. The respondents College and University can take further course of action upon the judgment of the Committee in the validation proceedings.

7.

Writ Petitions accordingly are disposed of. No costs. 8.

Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) fmp/wp3152.16