← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5630/2020delay condonatedrejected

Jadusing Dalsing Barwal v. Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division (Local Sector) Jalna And ORS

2022-09-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More5 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 938 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3908 OF 2020 IN FAST/8071/2019 SANJAY SHIVLAL BARWAL 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4009 OF 2020 IN FAST/8096/2019 SHIVLAL CHANGANSING BARWAL 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4010 OF 2020 IN FAST/8063/2019 DNYANDEV ASHARAM GORE 941 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4013 OF 2020 IN FAST/8237/2019 PANDURANG SAYAJI CHADIDAR 942 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4022 OF 2020 IN FAST/8056/2019

(2) ANANDSING ASARAM BARWAL 943 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4023 OF 2020 IN FAST/8112/2019 DADARAO KISAN KHENDHALE 948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4312 OF 2020 IN FAST/8060/2019 BANSI CHAGAN BARWAL 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4393 OF 2020 IN FAST/8092/2019 ASARAM CHAGANSING BARWAL 953 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4612 OF 2020 IN FAST/8108/2019 BALIRAM SAYAJI CHADIDAR

(3) 954 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4676 OF 2020 IN FAST/2868/2019 KISAN SHAMU PANGUL THROUGH LRS JAYWANTABAI AND OTHERS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER - 1 U.T.P.H JALGAON AND ANOTHER 955 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5541 OF 2020 IN FAST/8132/2019 KRISHNA SAYAJI CHADIDAR 956 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5547 OF 2020 IN FAST/8101/2019 NARAYAN SHIVLAL BARWAL 957 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5573 OF 2020 IN FAST/8077/2019 PRALHAD VITHOBA TARDE 958 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5629 OF 2020 IN FAST/8065/2019 KAPURCHAND HARICHAND BARWAL

(4) 959 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5630 OF 2020 IN FAST/8073/2019 JADUSING DALSING BARWAL ...

Mr. I.K. Wagh, Advocate holding for Mr. K.M. More, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. A.A. Jagatkar and Mr. P.N. Kutti, AGPs for State in respective applications.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

14.09.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard the rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay as mentioned in their applications, which has been caused due to their poor fnancial condition. The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the respective delay periods as mentioned in the applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall

(5) not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods. 3.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. 4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde