Ruksana Pandit Kale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 944-ACB-52-20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL NO.52 OF 2020 RUKSANA PANDIT KALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Dilip B. Rode, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. W. Munde, APP for Respondent No.1- State Mr. R. G. Nirmal, Advocate h/f Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

DATE : 11th JANUARY, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

This application is filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in favour of respondent Nos. 2 to 6, by the Additional Sessions Court, Shrigonda, in Crime No.1065/2018, registered with Shrigonda Police Station, Ahmednagar, for offences punishable under Sections 376, 143, 147, 149, 343, 323, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code, on 30/10/2018.

2.

Heard learned advocate for applicant, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State and learned advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 6.

3.

It is transpired during the course of hearing that applicant/prosecutrix has expired, so also one of the accused persons.

SVH

2 944-ACB-52-20.odt 4.

In the present crime, charge-sheet is filed. The case is numbered in the Sessions Court as R.C.C. No.35/2021 and the matter is kept on 15/02/2023 for appearance of accused persons. 5.

Considering the aforestated facts, it is not desirable to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of respondent Nos. 2 to 6 at such belated stage. Application is, therefore, dismissed. (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH