← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2887/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Mohd. Ibrahim Sattar Miya Thr His Power Of Attorney Holder Abdul Mujeeb Mohammed Ibrahim v. Abdul Khalil Sattar Miya

2024-07-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:13236 1 935 ca 2887-24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2887 OF 2024 IN SAST/7603/2024 MOHD. IBRAHIM SATTAR MIYA THR HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ABDUL MUJEEB MOHAMMED IBRAHIM

VERSUS

ABDUL KHALIL SATTAR MIYA ...

Mr. Patale Amol N, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Deshmukh Yogesh P., Advocate for Respondent ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 05/07/2024.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The application is for condonation of delay of only 56 days in filing second appeal.

3.

Though the application is opposed, but considering the short period of delay, it stands allowed in terms of prayer clause -B and disposed of.

4.

Second Appeal be registered after removal office objections, if any.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-