Hanumant Tatyarao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3519 OF 2016 IN FA/926/2009 HANUMANT TATYARAO PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr G V Mohekar AGP for Respondents:Mr S R Yadav Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr Ruturaj Patil ...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: March 18, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

This is an application for withdrawal of the amount. 2.

Mr Patil, learned counsel for the acquiring body and Mr. Yadav, the learned AGP opposed the application on the ground that the Reference Court has granted exorbitant compensation. 3.

Today the Award is in favour of the applicant. It would be in nobody's interest to keep the amount idle.

4.

In view of the above, I pass the following order. The applicants are allowed to withdraw 50% amount by submitting an undertaking to this Court that in the event if they are required to deposit the amount, they would deposit the said amount within one (1) month.

The applicants are allowed to withdraw 25% amount on furnishing solvent security of like amount.

The remaining amount be kept in fixed deposit of any Nationalized bank.

5.

Civil application accordingly disposed of.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ...

aaa/-