Prabhulal@Parmanand Hiraman Choundiye v. Rohit Shashikant Patwari

CRA 239/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 239 OF 2007 Prabhulal @ Parmanand S/o Hiraman Choundiye .. Petitioner Vs.

Rohit Shashikant Patwari .. Respondent ---- None present for petitioner Mr. Ruchir S. Wani, Advocate i/b Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent ---- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 10/07/2015 ORAL ORDER :

None appears for the revision petitioner.

2.

Mr. Wani i/b Mr. Bajaj files on record the true copy of the sale deed which would show that in-fact, the suit property is now sold by the respondent - Rohit in favour of the joint family i.e. the son of the present petitioner, who is 70 years old and other family members, however, no cognizance of the same can be taken as the petitioner was a tenant.

CRA 239/2007 3.

In absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner, heard Mr. Wani i/b Mr. Bajaj. Perused the record.

4.

The record would show that decree for eviction was sought by the respondent on the ground of willful default in payment of rent, need of the respondentlandlord for personal use and occupation. 5.

Upon reading of the record, it is clear that concurrent findings of facts are recorded by the Courts below. No material irregularity in appreciation of the evidence is shown. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Application is hereby dismissed without any order as to costs.

[M.T. JOSHI] JUDGE arp/