← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/449/2023application allowed

Dhondiba Sopanrao Shrirame v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2023-03-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare2 pages

931- BA-449-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO.449 OF 2023 DHONDIBA SOPANRAO SHRIRAME

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Arvind Gangadhar APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. K. S. Patil Advocate for respondent No.2 : Shriniwas Kulkarni ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 30.03.2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State and the learned counsel for respondent No.2/victim.

2.

The statement of the victim is very specific that out of love relation they got married. They were residing as husband and wife. However, she had some physical ailment. Hence, she was admitted to the hospital. In her statement she nowhere stated that any atrocities have been committed with her. First information report must have been lodged since she was admitted to the hospital for treatment as she was pregnant. Prima facie it appears that victim and the applicant have no grievance

931- BA-449-2023.odt against each other. In the facts and circumstances of the case the applicant deserves bail. Hence, the following order

ORDER

(i) Bail Application is allowed.

(ii) Applicant Dhondiba Sopanrao Shrirame be released on bail on furnishing P. B. and S.B. of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount, in Crime No 19/2023 registered with Basmath Police Station (Rural), Taluka Basmath, District Hingoli for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376(2) (I) of Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 and 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, on the following conditions :- (a) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. (b) He shall attend the trial on each and every effective date. (iii) The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad do pay the fee to the learned counsel appointed for respondent No.2/Victim, as per the schedule.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE ysk