← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3419/2024disposed off

Gangapur Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd Gangapur Through Its Chairman v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2024-04-02Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:7198-DB wp-3419.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 WRIT PETITION NO. 3419 OF 2024 GANGAPUR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD GANGAPUR THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. R.P. Gour, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. ...

CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 2nd APRIL 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and perused the documents on record. It appears that the petitioner found that there were some irregularities / illegalities in the audit that was done of the petitioner Karkhana and therefore petitioner Karkhana decided to have re-audit. Accordingly they approached respondent No.2 - Regional Joint Director (Sugar), Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. Respondent No.2 by order dated 27th October 2023 directed respondent No.3 - District Special Auditor Class-I, Co-operative Societies (Sugar), Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar to

wp-3419.24 carry out the re-audit and submit the report. Petitioner states that respondent No.3 has not acted in pursuance to order given by respondent No.2.

2.

Upon inquiry, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that petitioner Karkhana has not approached respondent No.2 once again after finding that respondent No.3 is not re-auditing the accounts of the petitioner.

3.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach respondent No.2 with an appropriate representation within one week. Thereupon respondent No.2 to decide the said representation within a period of one month thereafter. 4.

Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE asb/APR24