Sachin Kalyan Jambhale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:10453

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 15 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN NO. 355 OF 2025 1] VIKRAM DATTATRAY KORHALE 2] DATTATRAY BABASAHEB @ LALASAHEB KORHALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.S.V.Jadhavar h/f. Mr.S.S.Thombre APP for Respondent-state : Mr.N.B.Patil Advocate for Assist to P.P. : Mr.R.R.Karpe h/f.Mr.D.S.Ingole ...

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 937 OF 2025 IN ABA/355/2025 ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 07.04.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard. For the reasons stated in Criminal Application No.937/2025 for assisting to P.P., the same is allowed.

2] Heard learned counsel for the applicants, the learned APP for the respondent-State and the learned counsel for assist to P.P.

3] The applicants are apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 0027/2025, registered with

Karjat Police Station, Karjat, District Ahilyanagar, for the offence punishable under Section 109, 115 (2), 351 (2), 351 (3), 352 and 3 (5) of the B.N.S.

4] The learned counsel for the applicants submits that original accused no.1-Vishwajeet Korhale has surrendered before the Police. He further submits this Court, by order dated 11.03.2025 has granted interim protection in favour of the applicants i.e. original accused nos.2 and 3 and the same was not on merits. He further submits that in terms of said order, the applicants have cooperated with the investigation and the applicants have also surrendered the rod, which is alleged to be used by the applicants, in the assault.

5] Considering that the grievous injury is caused at the instance of the accused no.1, who has surrendered before the police and the allegation is that the injuries caused to the informant at the instance of the present applicants are simple in nature. The custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary in the matter. In view of the same, the interim protection granted by order dated 11.03.2025 stands confirmed, in the following terms : i] The applicants shall attend the concerned police station as and when required by the investigating officer.

ii] The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. They shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iii] The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

6] In the event, the applicants violate any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

7] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

8] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC