Shantaram Pundalik Gaikwad And ANR v. Union Of India

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4032 OF 2020 IN FAST/8217/2019 SUNIL VASANTRAV ZOPE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND 945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4044 OF 2020 IN FAST/8235/2019 TUKARAM DEVBA GAVALI

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND 946 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4045 OF 2020 IN FAST/8231/2019 PHULABAI PRAKASH SONAWANE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND 947 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4305 OF 2020 IN FAST/8233/2019 KAYMO CHHAMIR KHAN AND OTHERS

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND 950 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4396 OF 2020 IN FAST/8209/2019 SHANTARAM PUNDALIK GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND 951 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4397 OF 2020 IN FAST/8199/2019

(2) SOBHABAI NANA BHIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND 952 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4398 OF 2020 IN FAST/8205/2019 ARUN ANANDA JARAD (DIED) MALANBAI ARUN JARAD

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA ...

Mr. Vishnu B. Madan, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. B.M. Dhanure, Advocate for the respondent. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

14.09.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard the rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay as mentioned in their applications, which has been caused due to their poor fnancial condition. The learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay. 2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the respective delay periods as mentioned in the applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods.

(3) 3.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. 4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde