← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3552/2025disposed off

Shaikh Aasim Rizwan Shaikh Manzoor v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2025-03-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:7564-DB 1 966.wp.3552.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3552 OF 2025 SHAIKH AASIM RIZWAN SHAIKH MANZOOR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Syed Azizoddin R. AGP for respondents/State : Ms. P.J. Bharad Advocate for respondent No.2 : Mr. A.R. Nikam ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 13.03.2025 PER COURT:

.

The petitioner is before us seeking to participate in the selection process through second round of TAIT 2022 process being undertaken by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

2.

It is being pointed out that though the petitioner has been permanently debarred from appearing at the TET examination for the alleged scam, he was having the requisite qualification of C-TET as prescribed under Rule 6 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 read together with Rule 2(1)(e-1) wherein TET has been defined, inter alia, to mean even the C-TET. 3.

The learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.2, for want of concrete instructions is unable to make any statement as to if the

2 966.wp.3552.25.odt petitioner can participate in selection process through second round of TAIT 2022.

4.

We dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No. 2 to permit the petitioner to participate in selection process through TAIT 2022 on the basis of his C-TET qualification, in the selection process through second round of TAIT 2022, if there is no legal impediment which enables the respondent No. 2 to prevent him, except on the ground that his TET performance has been cancelled and he has been debarred.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb/