Mandakini Devendra Mali And ORS v. Union Of India

1 39 ca 3843-20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 39 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3843 OF 2020 IN FAST/8229/2019 MANDAKINI DEVENDRA MALI AND ORS

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Vishnu B. Madan Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. B. Bagul ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 12/06/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 231 days, which appears to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition. The learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. 3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 231 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.

4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-