← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/8531/2020delay condonatedrejected

The Ex. Engineer, Lower Terna Canal Div. 2 Latur And ORS v. Dyanoba Panda Sathe And ANR

2021-07-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni2 pages

911CA8531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8531 OF 2020 IN FAST/8479/2020 THE EX. ENGINEER, LOWER TERNA CANAL DIV. 2, LATUR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

DYANOBA PANDA SATHE AND OTHERS Advocate for Applicant No. 1 : Smt. R.D. Reddy. AGP for Applicant Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Y.G. Gujrathi. Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. V.V. Kabade. CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATED : 01.07.2021 PER COURT :

It is an application for condonation of delay moved by the applicants / original respondents in filing the appeal. 2.

Heard Smt. Reddy, learned Advocate for applicant No. 1 / original respondent No. 1, learned AGP for applicant Nos. 2 and 3 and learned Advocate Mr. Kabade, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 3.

Issue notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Kabade, learned Advocate submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of all the respondents / original claimants in the matter and waives service for them.

4.

Learned Advocate Mr. Kabade, strongly opposes to condone the

911CA8531 delay. He submits that the reasons assigned for condonation of delay are not sound.

5.

For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay and to meet the ends of justice, I am convinced to condone the delay.

ORDER

i.

The application for condonation of delay is hereby allowed. ii.

The Registry is directed to scrutinize the appeal as per procedure and it be numbered and be placed for admission. iii.

Call record and proceedings from the reference Court. iv.

Stand over to 22.07.2021.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ) S.P.C.