Satish Gamanlal Jain v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 4164.18+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4164 OF 2018 Shrikant Veerchand Shaha .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4165 OF 2018 Satish Gamanlal Jain .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4166 OF 2018 Rahul Arunlal Jain and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, Addl. G. P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE:

th JANUARY, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

In all these matters it is not disputed by

2 wp 4164.18+ the respondents that the land of the petitioners are under acquisition.

2.

Mr. Dande, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the possession has not yet been taken. It is further submitted by the learned counsel that twice the negotiation had taken place with the petitioners, however the same could not fructify.

3.

If the land is not acquired by negotiation within a period of six months from today, then after the lapse of six months the respondent shall initiate acquisition proceedings as per the provisions of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and the same shall be concluded expeditiously and preferably within a period of one year from the start of acquisition proceedings.

4.

It is also open for the respondents to take decision with regard to deletion of the petitioners land from acquisition.

3 wp 4164.18+ 5.

The writ petitions accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.

[A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe