Prabhakar Angad Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra

G.A.Ghule [P.A.] 1/2 cri.appln. 1462.15..sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction.

Criminal Application No. 1462 Of 2015.

PRABHAKAR ANGAD KAMBLE.

VERSUS

THE STATE Of MAHARASHTRA.

Appearance => Mr. Chaitanya Dharurkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. Pratibha Bharad, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Maharashtra.

CORAM

:

V.M. Deshpande, J.

DATE :

6th April, 2015.

Per Court :- Present Criminal Application is filed by the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail, since he is apprehending his arrest in connection with CR No. 25/2015 registered with Police Station, Nalegaon, Taluka Chakur, District - Latur for the offences punishable under Section.s. 498(A), 323, 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. [2] Heard Mr. C.V. Dharurkar, learned counsel for the Applicant and Mrs. Pratibha Bharad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

[3] First Information Report is lodged by the wife of present applicant on 17th January, 2015 since she was subjected to cruelty and she was assaulted.

2/2 cri.appln. 1462.15..sxw [4] The marriage between the First Informant and the present applicant took place on 23/05/2013. In fact, the F.I.R. also discloses that on previous occasion the applicant has forcibly administered the kerosene to the First Informant however, with a hope that the applicant may mend his way, the matter was not reported to the Police.

[5] The Investigating Office has filed his detailed reply before this Court. From Paragraph No.5 of the reply, it is clear that, the applicant is absconding and he is not co-operating at all to the Investigating Officer. Notice under Section 41(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was issued to the present applicant, however he did not join the investigation.

[6] As a dutiful citizen of this country, it was expected from the applicant to attend the Police Station however, according to the reply, the applicant has not attended the Police Station and is absconding. In that view of the matter, the applicant does not deserves any discretionary relief, from this court. Criminal Application is rejected. (V.M. DESHPANDE, J.)