Purushottam Atmaram Padwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6275 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.8784 OF 2013 Purushottam s/o Atmaram Padwal ... APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. E.S. Murge, Advocate for applicant Mr. K.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.

Mr. M.N. Navandar, Advocate for respondent No.2. .......

CORAM :

R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATE :

5th AUGUST, 2021 PER COURT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties. For the reasons given in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) on condition that the applicants - claimants shall not be granted interest, if any, for the delayed period of 986 days. Delay condoned. Appeal be registered. ( R. G. AVACHAT ) JUDGE fmp/-