Balasaheb Dnynoba Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 W.P.No.3743/17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT

BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO.3743 OF 2017 Balasaheb Dnyanoba Patil ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others.

... Respondents.

...

Mr.A.B.Kale, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.A.A.Jagatkar, A.G.P. for the State.

...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL,JJ.

Date : 21.3.2017.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has applied with the Collector for determination of the amount of rental compensation, however, no cognizance is

2 W.P.No.3743/17 taken of the same.

3.

Learned A.G.P. appears for Respondents.

4.

The petitioner shall make an application seeking rental compensation to Respondent No.3. On receipt of the application, the Respondent No.3 shall determine the aspect of rental compensation on its own merits in accordance with law after hearing all parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within nine

(9) months from the date of receipt of the application.

5.

The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) asp/office/wp3743.17

3 W.P.No.3743/17

4 W.P.No.3743/17