Subhash Madhavrao Birajdar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
1 wp 5440.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5440 OF 2021 Hussain Sakhauddin Mulla Shri V. C. Patil, Advocate h/f Shri U. B. Bondar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri S. T. Tiwari, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. WRIT PETITION NO. 5444 OF 2021 Layak Mehtab Shaikh Shri V. C. Patil, Advocate h/f Shri U. B. Bondar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri A. R. Kale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. WRIT PETITION NO. 6202 OF 2021 Isaq Noor Karbhari and another .. Petitioners WRIT PETITION NO. 6203 OF 2021 Ismail Bashir Maniyar WRIT PETITION NO. 6204 OF 2021
2 wp 5440.21 Noor Pachasab Shaikh WRIT PETITION NO. 6205 OF 2021 Bandeali Bashir Fakir WRIT PETITION NO. 6206 OF 2021 Karim Akbar Dhekle WRIT PETITION NO. 6207 OF 2021 Nisar Mohammad Shaikh WRIT PETITION NO. 6208 OF 2021 Chand Mustafa Shaikh Rozewale WRIT PETITION NO. 6209 OF 2021 Subhash Madhavrao Birajdar
3 wp 5440.21 WRIT PETITION NO. 6210 OF 2021 Zahir Ajiz Patel @ Shaikh WRIT PETITION NO. 6211 OF 2021 Basavraj Shivraj Patil Shri V. C. Patil, Advocate h/f Shri U. B. Bondar, Advocate for the Petitioner in all matters.
Shri S. P. Tiwari and Shri A. R. Kale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in respective matters.
CORAM :
S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE :
20TH APRIL, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleaders for the respondents/ State in respective matters.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the respondents be directed to allow the petitioners to occupy their respective tin sheds till actual start of construction work of shopping complex by the Gram Panchayat or by the Government. 3.
Naturally, the work of construction of shopping complex
4 wp 5440.21 has to be commenced by the contractor to whom work is allotted after giving vacant land.
4.
The petitioners may make representations to the authority concerned with regard to their prayer and the authority may consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and policy.
5.
The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. [SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/April 21