Bombay High CourtCP/234/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Nivrutti Janardhan Thite v. Sachin Nagnath Jagtap And Another

2016-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

1 19-CP-225 and ors.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 225 OF 2016 IN WP/8184/2014 KISHOR RAVAN GAIKWAR

VERSUS

SACHIN NAGNATH JAGTAP AND ANOTHER WITH CP/226/2016 IN WP/8020/2014 WITH CP/227/2016 IN WP/8015/2014 WITH CP/228/2016 IN WP/8186/2014 WITH CP/229/2016 IN WP/8014/2014 WITH CP/230/2016 IN WP/7951/2014 WITH CP/231/2016 IN WP/7949/2014 WITH CP/232/2016 IN WP/8017/2014 WITH CP/233/2016 IN WP/8010/2014 WITH CP/234/2016 IN WP/8023/2014 WITH CP/235/2016 IN WP/8047/2014 WITH CP/236/2016 IN WP/7947/2014 WITH CP/237/2016 IN WP/8195/2014 WITH CP/238/2016 IN WP/8019/2014 WITH CP/239/2016 IN WP/8193/2014 WITH CP/240/2016 IN WP/8201/2014 WITH CP/241/2016 IN WP/8021/2014 WITH CP/242/2016 IN WP/8016/2014 WITH CP/243/2016 IN WP/8018/2014 WITH CP/244/2016 IN WP/7943/2014 WITH CP/245/2016 IN WP/8187/2014 WITH CP/246/2016 IN WP/8008/2014 -- Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, advocate for petitioners in all petitions Mr.S.B.Ghute, advocate nos.1 and 2 in all petitions --

2 19-CP-225 and ors.odt CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 25, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2] The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2 jointly submit that the orders of which disobedience is alleged in these Contempt Petitions, have been complied with.

3] In that view of the matter, the Contempt Petitions stand disposed of.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.] kbp