← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3283/2015rejected at admission stage

Pallavi Kantrao Suryawanshi v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-12-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora2 pages

3283.15wp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 3283 OF 2015 PALLAVI KANTRAO SURYAWANSHI

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Kolhare S.R.

AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.V.M. Kagne.

Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr.Nikam Anup R.

...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.

Dated: DECEMBER 17, 2015 ...

Heard.

Perused the pleadings in the petition, annexures thereto, and the reply filed by respondent No.2 with annexures. It appears that the petitioner proceeded to file writ petition on the basis of merit list making grievance that though the petitioner has secured 129 marks from the OBC General category, less meritorious candidates from the said category have been selected. In reply to the assertion of the petitioner that less meritorious candidates than the petitioner from OBCGeneral category have been selected, the learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 invited our attention

3283.15wp to the contents of the affidavit-in-reply and also the list published on 20th January, 2015 wherein, in detail, categories are mentioned. According to the Counsel for respondent No.2, the candidates from OBC Project Affected category are selected since cut-off marks for the said category were "126". The petitioner is from OBC-General Category, wherein the cut-off is 144 marks.

In that view of the matter, we do not see reason to entertain the petition. Hence petition stands rejected.

However, it will be open for the petitioner to verify the list of selected candidates published by the respondent No.2 on 28th January, 2015 and in case, the statement made in the reply filed by respondent No.2 is incorrect, to pray for review.

(P.R. BORA, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/