← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3369/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Usha Babasaheb Chitale v. Sub Divisional Officer Aurangabad And Another

2018-04-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane2 pages

{1} wp336918.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

(1) WRIT PETITION NO.3369 OF 2018 Sow Usha Babasaheb Chitale Petitioner

Versus

Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad and another Respondents WITH

(2) WRIT PETITION NO.3381 OF 2018 Smt.Sunita Rampalsinh Prajapati Petitioner

Versus

Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad and another Respondents WITH

(3) WRIT PETITION NO.3382 OF 2018 Babasaheb Bhanudas Chitale & others Petitioners

Versus

Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad and another Respondents WITH

(4) WRIT PETITION NO.3383 OF 2018 Sopan Babasaheb Jadhav & another Petitioners

Versus

Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad and another Respondents WITH

(5) WRIT PETITION NO.3384 OF 2018 Smt. Shantabai Maniklalji Kundalwal Petitioner

Versus

{2} wp336918.odt Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad and another Respondents WITH

(6) WRIT PETITION NO.3385 OF 2018 Charansing Bajirsing Juni Petitioner

Versus

Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad and another Respondents Mr.K.J.Suryawanshi, advocate for petitionrs.

Mr.Arvind R. Kowode, advocate with Mr.D.D.Jadhav, advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 03rd April, 2018.

P.C. :

The petitioners have placed on record copy of the application purportedly tendered by Respondent No.2 to the Sub Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer, National Highway No.211, on 20.03.2018. Same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Petitioners contend that the grievance raised by them in these petitions stand satisfied in view of the application tendered by Respondent No.2 relinquishing his claim in respect of compensation amount.

In view of above, these writ petitions are disposed of. K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb