← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9346/2018compramised

Sanjay Vishnu Nikam And Others v. Jayantilal Manilal Doshi Lrs Tejshri @ Hansa And Others

2022-05-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 SECOND APPEAL NO.609 OF 2018 WITH CA/9279/2018 IN SA/609/2018 WITH CA/9346/2018 IN SA/618/2018 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2018 VISHNU MAHIPAT NIKAM LRS .VIDYA VISHNU NIKAM

VERSUS

JAYANTILAL MANILAL DOSHI LRS TEJSHRI @ HANSA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. S. Dixit (SA/609/2018) Advocate for respondents no. 1B and 1C-1 : Mr. S.P. Brahme (SA/609/2018) Advocate for the respondent no. 2, 3A to 3G : Mr. S.V. Dixit (SA/609/2018) Advocate for appellant : Mr. S.V. Dixit (SA/618/2018) Advocate for respondent no.1B and 1C-1 : Mr. S.P. Brahme (SA/618/2018) Advocate for respondent no. 2A : Mr. S.S. Dixit (SA/618/2018) AGP for respondent - State : Mr. N.T. Bhagat ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 6 MAY 2022 PC :

The parties have reached an amicable settlement in both these second appeals. The terms of compromise have been settled and have been duly verified before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 2.

The second appeals are disposed of as compromised in terms of the consent terms settled and duly verified which are marked as 'X' for the purpose of identification.

3.

The decree be drawn up in terms of the settlement. 4.

Pending civil applications stand disposed of. [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE arp/