← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4921/2016admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Smt. Surekha Deoram Barkale And Another v. The Stete Of Maharashtra Through Collector Jalgaon And Others

2017-01-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh2 pages

4921.2016.CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4921 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 8655 OF 2016 Smt. Surekha Deoram Barkale and another ...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ...

Mr. P. A. Madhukar., Advocate for applicants Mr. A. P. Basarkar, AGP for respondent no. 1/State Mr. M. K. Goyanka, Advocate for respondent no. 2 ...

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

Date: 6th January, 2017 PER COURT:

1.

Learned advocate for the applicants points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Learned advocates for the respondents though purport to resist are not in a position to dispute veracity of the reasons. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filling second

4921.2016.CA.odt appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause (B) and is disposed of. (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH) JUDGE VDK