Mangesh Shrikrushna Bibekar v. Ganesh Ramchandra Dhobale And Another

{1} 937 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2651 OF 2015 IN FAST/8476/2014 MANGESH SHRIKRUSHNA BIBEKAR

VERSUS

GANESH RAMCHANDRA DHOBALE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pavankumar S. Agrawal Adv. for Respondents: Mr. A.B. Gatne CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 16th August, 2017.

PER COURT:

1] Heard the learned counsel for applicant/appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.2 Insurance Company. 2] Despite service of notice to respondent No.1 none appears on his behalf. There is a meager delay of 166 days in filing the appeal. According to learned counsel for the applicant, delay was not intentional and deliberate but caused due to unavoidable circumstances. The matter pertains to 3] In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, delay is hereby condoned. The application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Registry to take requisite steps for further process. On registration of appeal, Admit. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 Insurance Company waives service for said respondent. Notice of admission of appeal be issued to respondent No.1 through paper publication.

{2} 937 sr.no..odt 4] After procedural compliance, appeal be listed for final hearing in due course.

[K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.

grt/-