Shivaji S/O. Hanmallu Goskulwad And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

940-CriAppln-843-2020 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2020 SHIVAJI S/O. HANMALLU GOSKULWAD AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ......

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Menezes Joslyn A. APP for Respondent No.1-State : Mr. S. J. Salgare Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. A. Deshpande .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED : 06th OCTOBER, 2021 PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard learned counsel for the applicants and the counsel representing respondent no.2 for some time. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Learned counsel submits that the trial court has commenced with trial, however, progress of the trial is slow. Learned counsel thus submits that necessary directions may be given to the trial court for expeditious disposal of the case. 3.

Leave granted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

940-CriAppln-843-2020 -24.

The trial court is hereby directed to decide the pending case as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 5.

The criminal application is accordingly disposed off. 6.

We make it clear that we have not considered the case on merits. All points are kept open. It is for the trial court to dispose of the pending case on its own merits.

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (V. K. JADHAV, J.) vre