Shaikh Pasha Umar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:7213-DB *1*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 39 WRIT PETITION NO. 3344 OF 2024 SHAIKH PASHA UMAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR AND OTHERS ...

Shri Vikas S. Tanwade, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A.A.A. Khan, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2/State. ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & R.M. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE :- 02nd April, 2024 Per Court :- 1.

The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses B and C as under:- "B) By issuing the writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in the like nature the respondents may kindly be directed not to create any obstructions in the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the agricultural land comprise in gut no. 86 and 87 adm. 3 H. 59 R. and 1 H. 4 R. situated at village Kambi, Tq. and Dist. Beed without initiating any Land Acquisition Proceeding u/sec. 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013 C) By issuing the writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in the like nature the

*2* respondents may kindly be directed to initiate the land Acquisition Proceedings u/sec. 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013 and thereby completing the proceeding to its logical end by paying the compensation of the money to the petitioners in respect of land gut no. 86 and 87 adm. 3 H. 59 R. and 1 H. 4 R. situated at village Kambi, Tq. and Dist. Beed."

2.

The Petitioner himself was the Plaintiff before the Civil Court in Regular Civil Suit No.83/2018. By the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2020, the suit was decreed and the following declaration was made by the learned Civil Court:- "०२.

प्रतिवादीक.

५ते७यांनावादीचेशेतगटनं.

८६व८७ मौजेकांबीता.जि.

बीडयेथूननि.

३९नूसारअसलेलामोजणीनकाशा'क'

प्रतमधीलकेशरी, काळयावहिरव्यारंगानेदर्शविलेलारस्ताबैलगाडी, ट्रॅक्टरअथवाअवजडवाहनेवापराकरीताअथवायेण्याजाण्याकरीता कोणताहीरस्तानाही, असेघोषितकरण्यातयेतआहे.

०३.

प्रतिवादीक.

५ते७यांनीवादीच्याताब्यातीलवउपभोगातील गटनं.

८६व८७मौजेकांबी, ता.जि.

बीडयेथीलशेतीमध्येवाढीच्या ताब्यातवकब्जेउपभोगामध्येकोणताहीअडथळाकरूनये, असानिरंतर मनाईहुकूमपारीतकरण्यातयेतआहे."

*3* 3.

In the above backdrop, the Petitioner prays that we should direct the Government to acquire his land. 4.

The learned AGP submits, on instructions, that the Government does not need the land and has no intention of utilizing the said land.

5.

In view of the above, we have no cause before us for issuing a Writ of Mandamus. If anybody is violating the order of the Civil Court, the Petitioner is not remedy-less. 6.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed off.

kps ( R.M. JOSHI, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )