← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10603/2022delay condonatedrejected

Dattatray Vishvambhar Kulkarni (Died) Thr Lrs. Kusum W/O Dattatray Kulkarni (Rajwadkar) And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Parbhani And ORS

2022-11-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

(1) 949 CA-10603.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10603 OF 2022 IN FAST/8351/2022 DATTATRAY VISHVAMBHAR KULKARNI (DIED) THR LRS. KUSUM W/O DATTATRAY KULKARNI (RAJWADKAR) AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, PARBHANI AND OTHERS ...

Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. P.M. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

23.11.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 2506 days in filing the appeal. The delay appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that delay is not properly explained. The Acquiring Body though served, but remained absent. 2.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods as mentioned in this application stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period.

(2) 949 CA-10603.2022.odt 3.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections.

4.

The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde