Dipak Madhavrao Palepwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 3844.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3844 OF 2020 Laxman Ramrao Narod .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Chandrakant R. Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3852 OF 2020 Dipak Madhavrao Palepwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Chandrakant R. Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Rashmi P. Gaur, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE :

11TH MARCH 2020.

FINAL ORDER :

.

It submitted that validation proceedings in respect of the tribe claims of petitioners are pending with the scrutiny committee, the same are not decided.

2.

Without issuing notices to petitioners, the respondents have placed petitioners on the supernumerary posts.

2 wp 3844.20 3.

As the impugned action is without notice to petitioners, we quash and set aside the impugned action.

4.

In case, respondents want to take action against petitioners of placing petitioners on supernumerary posts or otherwise, then notice shall be issued to petitioners giving opportunity to show cause. In that event, petitioners can file reply and bring all the relevant facts to the notice of the respondent-Committee.

5.

The Committee shall decide the validation proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a period of within six months.

6.

The petitioners shall appear before the Committee on 26.03.2020.

7.

In the light of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/March 20