The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune v. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4213 OF 2018 IN TAX APPEAL NO.67 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune ..Applicant

Versus

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad ..Respondent Mr Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for applicant Mr P.S. Dighe, Advocate i/b Mr R.N.Dhorde, Senior Counsel for respondent CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. DHAVALE, JJ DATE : 23rd March 2018 PER COURT 1.

Motion is made on the ground that the Advocate for the appellant was present on 23.2.2018, but inadvertently, is marked absent. 2.

The learned Counsel for the non-applicant/original respondent also accepts the said fact.

3.

Considering the above, in order dated 23.2.2018, in Tax Appeal No.67/2008, in the title cause, Mr Alok Sharma Standing Counsel for the appellant be shown present and paragraph 1 of the said order be deleted. 4.

Civil Application disposed of.

( A.M. DHAVALE, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) vvr