← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4074/2025disposed off

Param Developers Through Its Partners Parmeshwar Santaram Rajbinde And Others v. Akruti Consultancy Service Through Its Partners Avinash Ganpatrao Solapure And Others

2025-03-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:8951 903-WP-4074-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4074 OF 2025 Param Developers Through Its Partners Parmeshwar Santaram Rajbinde And Others

VERSUS

Akruti Consultancy Service Through Its Partners Avinash Ganpatrao Solapure And Others *** • Mr. V. D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. A. A. Yadkikar i/by Mr. M. K. Bhosale, Advocate for the Petitioners • Mr. N. T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for the Respondents *** CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J DATE : MARCH 26, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

Leave to amend.

2.

After hearing learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners as well as learned Counsel for Respondents, this Court has expressed a prima facie view that the question will arise as to whether it was open for the District Court to entertain a relief which was not made before Trial Court. This Court has also expressed that entertaining any such relief which was not sought before Trial Court will lead to denial of opportunity of Appeal against any order passed by the Court. At this stage, learned Counsel for the Respondents, on Umesh

903-WP-4074-2025.odt instructions, seeks no further order on merit of the case. He concedes for setting aside the impugned orders.

3.

In view of this, Petition stands allowed. impugned orders are set aside.

4.

Learned Counsel for Respondents/Original Plaintiffs seeks leave to move appropriate application as provided by law before the Trial Court.

5.

Leave is granted.

6.

Any such application if initiated before Trial Court, it be decided within a period of a month. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Umesh