← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5238/2018admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Rameshchandra Prahladrai Agrawal v. Govindlal Shrikishan Chandak And Others

2021-01-28Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5238 OF 2018 IN SAST/4905/2018 RAMESHCHANDRA PRAHLADRAI AGRAWAL

VERSUS

GOVINDLAL SHRIKISHAN CHANDAK AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Ms. Dube Anjali (Bajpai) Advocate for Respondents No.5 and 6 : Mr. S. S. Rathi. Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3 : Mr. S. B. Darwande holding for Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar Advocate for Respondents No.4A to 4C : Mr. Mr. R. D. Borde. ...

CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 28-01-2021 PER COURT :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Present application has been filed for getting delay of one day in filing second appeal condoned.

3.

Learned Advocate Mr. Rathi for respondents No.5 and 6 is present and he is not seriously objecting for condoning the delay of one day.

4.

Learned Advocate Mr. S. B. Darwande holding for Advocate Mr. Chapalgaonkar representing respondents No.1 to 3 is present. He is also seriously not objecting. Learned Advocate representing respondents No.4A to 4C is also present.

5.

Taking into consideration the duration of the delay and the

CA 5238-2018 reasons stated in the paragraphs No.6 and 7, the delay stands condoned.

6.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

7.

Registry to verify and register the second appeal. (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE vjg/-.