← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4633/2021disposed off

Komal Ganesh Haral And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2021-03-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4633 OF 2021 Komal W/o Ganesh Haral and another ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents.

....

Mr. Ujwal Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. Anudeep D. Sonar, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondents / State. ....

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 17th MARCH, 2021 PER COURT:- 1.

The petitioner No.1 seeks permission to terminate the pregnancy. The petitioner No.1 was referred to the Expert Committee at Government Medical College and Hospital at Aurangabd. The Expert Committee has examined the petitioner No.1 and submitted the report. Relevant part of the report reads thus : "13. Investigation done :

Sr. No.

Report reviewed Opinion on the findings CBC, URINE ROUTINE Hb-11.8 gm %, Urine RoutineNormal

USG Single live intrauterine gestation of 20 weeks 1 days with asymmetric IUGR, secondary to fetoplacental & uteroplacental insufficiency with Oligohydromnios and small Thoracic Cavity with mild pericardial effusion. Echogenic bowel loops & Chorioangioma

14. Additional findings and observations :- N.A.

15. Physical fitness for termination :- a) Yes.

b) No.

16. Recommendation by Medical Board for termination : Recommended

17. Recommended Medical termination of pregnancy with due maternal risk. Surgical intervention & blood transfusion may be required. The risk involved in the said procedure is explained to the patient & her relatives.

Date and Time : 16/03/2021 AT 2:30 PM"

2.

The Expert Committee has recommended the termination of pregnancy. The risk involved in the said procedure is explained to the petitioners.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are informed about the risk involved in termination of the pregnancy. The petitioner No.1 wants to proceed further with the termination of the pregnancy.

4.

In the light of the report of the expert committee, petitioner No.1 is permitted to terminate the pregnancy at any Government recognized center.

5.

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

6.

Parties to act upon the authenticate copy.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE S.P. Rane