Sushila Vitthal Waghmare v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Osmanabad And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:32108 21 CA 5776 OF 2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5776 OF 2025 IN FAST/8489/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5777 OF 2025 IN FAST/8528/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5778 OF 2025 IN FAST/8615/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5779 OF 2025 IN FAST/8619/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5780 OF 2025 IN FAST/8621/2025 ARJUN BABHIM MAGAR (DIED) THR. LRS KUMD ARJUN MAGAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ingale Vivekanand V. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. S.V. Hange ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 20.11.2025 PER COURT :

None appears for respondent no. 3, who is the contesting party, though applicants pray condonation of delay of 3734 days. 2.

The learned A.G.P. opposes the application.

3.

The contesting party has not controverted the averments in the applications soliciting condonation of delay. There are no mala fides on the part of the applicants in preferring the appeals belatedly. The delay needs to be condoned on certain condition.

4.

The delay stands condoned on condition that the applicants shall not be entitled to claim interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 1/1