← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3736/2005disposed off

Jitendra Vinayak Nikam v. State Of Mah And ORS

2024-01-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:1220 3736.05WP+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 WRIT PETITION NO. 3736 OF 2005 JITENDRA VINAYAK NIKAM

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ...

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.Sanket S. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondent : Mrs.K.R.Jamdhade Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.P.Shah h/f. Mr.P.S.Shendurnikar ...

AND 908 WRIT PETITION NO. 3874 OF 2005 PRADEEP HIRALAL PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR.

...

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.Sanket S. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondent : Mrs.K.R.Jamdhade Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.P.Shah h/f. Mr.P.S.Shendurnikar ...

CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :18.01.2024 P.C. :

1] The learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on record copies of the letters dated 15.01.2024 and the same are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid letters are written by the petitioners to the learned counsel for the petitioners stating

3736.05WP+ therein that they do not wish to prosecute the present Writ Petitions, therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petitions. 2] The present Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

3] In view of withdrawal of the Writ Petitions, the pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC