← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/213/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Shaikh Ruksana Khaja Through Gpa Shaikh Khaja Rashid v. Priyanka Pawar Kardile Deputy Collector Majalgaon And Another

2018-04-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane1 pages

{1} 905, 906 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CONT. PETITION NO. 212 OF 2018 IN WP/2450/2018 MAHESH VACHISTHA GHUGE

VERSUS

PRIYANKA PAWAR KARDILE DEPUTY COLLECTOR MAJALGAON ANDANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sidhesh V. Jadhwar AGP for Respondents: Mr. P.N. Kutti WITH 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 213 OF 2018 IN WP/2452/2018 CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 5th April, 2018.

PER COURT:- The order passed by this court on 5.3.2018 is self-explanatory. It would be open for the petitioner to deposit the amount of penalty subject to decision in appeal. If the appellate forum allows the appeal presented by the petitioner, the revenue authorities shall have to refund the amount to the petitioner. In such circumstances, the petitioner shall comply with the directions issued by this court and secure the release of the vehicle. In view of above directions, the contempt applications stand disposed of. [K.K.SONAWANE, J] [R.M. BORDE, J] grt/-