Rabenbi Mehaboob Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 2-wp-4040-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 WRIT PETITION NO.4040 OF 2019 RABENBI MEHABOOB SHAIKH ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPODENTS ...

Mr. Anand V. Indrale Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 04th JUNE, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the Revision filed by the petitioner alongwith stay petition is not been decided by the respondents. 2.

The learned A.G.P. appearing for respondent nos.1 to 4 submits that the authority would decide the Revision on its own merits.

3.

The respondent where the Revision is pending shall decide it in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months.

4.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/June-19