← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3850/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Trimbak Chindhaji Kale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-06-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

{1} 55 WP 3850 of 2018 & ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 55 WRIT PETITION NO. 3850 OF 2018 Trimbak Chindhaji Kale ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others.

..Respondents ...

WITH 56 WRIT PETITION NO. 3860 OF 2018 Mohd. Asif Khan Amin Khan ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others.

..Respondents ...

WITH 58 WRIT PETITION NO. 3880 OF 2018 Suryakant Onkarrao Annadate ..Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others.

..Respondents ...

Mr.Vitthal G.Salgare, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr.K.N.Lokhande, Mr.P.N.Kutti and Mr.A.V.Deshmukh, AGPs for Respondents/State.

Mr.M.P.Kale h/f. Mr.A.P.Sawant Advocate for Respondent No.3.

...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE: 4th June, 2018

{2} 55 WP 3850 of 2018 & ors. PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard Mr.Vitthal G.Salgare learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.M.P.Kale learned counsel holding for Mr.A.P.Sawant learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and learned Additional Government Pleaders for the respondents/State. 2.

The parties are ad-idem that the present matters are covered by the Judgment of Division Bench of this Court passed in the case of Savitribai Narsayya Guddapa Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported in 2014 (6) Mh.L.J., 438.

3.

In the light of above, the present Writ Petitions are also disposed of in terms of the Judgment of this Court passed in case of Savitribai Narsayya Guddapa (supra).

4.

The decision shall be taken by the respondents within three months in tune with the Judgment of this Court in case of Savitribai Narsayya Guddapa (supra).

5.

Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs.

(SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) SPT