Shubhangi Pramod More And ORS v. Gokul Ganpat Vaze And ANR

2025:BHC-AUG:10825 964-Ca-3724-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 964 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3724 OF 2025 IN FAST/14136/2019 Shubhangi Pramod More And Ors ....Applicants

VERSUS

Gokul Ganpat Vaze And Anr.

.....Respondents .....

Mr. Bhokarikar Madhav M, Advocate for Applicants .....

CORAM

:

NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

DATE :

09.04.2025 PER COURT :

1.

This Application is for substituted service to Respondent No.1.

2.

The papers go to show that, the address of Respondent No.1 shown in the Claim Petition and the Appeal Memo is one and the same. The Paragraph No.4 of the impugned Judgment shows that, Respondent No.1 was served. The Bailiff Report in the Appeal shows that, Respondent No.1 was not found on the given address. 3.

In view of the above, the Application is allowed. The Applicants are permitted to serve Respondent No.1 through Paper Publication in Daily Tarun Bharat, New Mumbai / Thane Edition. The same shall be done before the next date.

4.

List the matter on 02/07/2025.

[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/April-2025 Signed by: Md. Sameer Q.

Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/04/2025 12:22:57