Shashikant Krishnaji Naik v. Rahul Gulabrao Patil And ANR

1 914 alp 62-18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BY PVT. PARTY NO.62 OF SHASHIKANT KRISHNAJI NAIK

VERSUS

RAHUL GULABRAO PATIL AND ANR ...

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A. R. Dhore h/f Mr. V. B. Patil ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 01/12/2023.

P. C. :

Record shows that the present application has been fxed for dismissal order since the applicant or his advocate failed to supply copies of necessary documents to the learned counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for respondents is present today, but none appeared for the applicant. Thus, it appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently. In view of the same, the application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-