← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/1200/2024application allowed

Rajendra Baban Shelke v. Riyaj Latif Inamdar And Another

2024-04-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:7972 aba416-24.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.416 OF 2024 Riyaj Latif Inamdar APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Another RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. K. K. Naik, APP for respondent - State Mr. D. R. Adhav, Advocate for informant .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 17 th APRIL, 2024 ORDER :

1.

After arguing at length on merits, when this Court was not inclined to grant relief, learned advocate for applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application. 2.

Permission granted.

3.

Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn. [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/aba416-24.doc

aba416-24.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1200 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.416 OF 2024 Rajendra Baban Shelke APPLICANT

VERSUS

Riyaj Latif Inamdar and Another RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. D. R. Adhav Advocate for the applicant Mr. K. K. Naik, APP for respondent - State Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for respondent No.1 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 17 th APRIL, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

3.

Applicant is permitted to assist learned APP. [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/aba416-24.doc