Bombay High CourtCP/240/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Pratiksha Digambar Mekhale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre1 pages

{1} cp240.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 240 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11860 OF 2018 Pratiksha d/o Digambar Mekhale Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. Ravindra Nirmal, advocate for petitioner. Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, AGP for respondents no. 1 and 2. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE : 4th April, 2019.

P.C. :

Learned AGP, on instructions from respondents, submits that the order of which contempt is complained, will be complied with within a period of two months from today. 2.

Since the statement is made on instructions, the same is accepted as undertaking on behalf of respondent-contempnor. 3.

Contempt petition as such stands dismissed.

NITIN W. SAMBRE PRASANNA B. VARALE JUDGE JUDGE dyb