Anil Biharilal Joshi v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} 925 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2583 OF 2013 ANIL BIHARILAL JOSHI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S. U. Chaudhari. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : Mr. S.G. Karlekar. Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Mr. P. R. Adkine. ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] Mr. Chaudhari, learned counsel submits that after filing of contempt petition, respondents have complied the orders passed by this Court. He submits that the respondents be saddled with costs. 2] The grievance of the petitioner stands redressed though belatedly. We have also read the affidavit filed by the respondents. Considering the averments made in the affidavit, we do not accede to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner for payment of costs. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-