← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/384/2009rule discharged

Madan Kedarnath Mundade v. Bhikan Pitambar Mali

2016-12-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav1 pages

9-10 wp.384.09 anr.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 384 OF 2009 MADAN KEDARNATH MUNDADE

VERSUS

BHIKAN PITAMBAR MALI AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 386 OF 2009 MADAN KEDARNATH MUNDADA

VERSUS

BHIKAN PITAMBAR MALI ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V. B. Patil.

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Prakashsing B. Patil. ...

CORAM :

V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATE :

20th December, 2016.

P.C.:

.

In view of the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra and another, reported in, (2014) 9 SCC 129 and thereafter in view of the insertion in Section 142-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the cause for filing the present criminal writ petitions has been rendered infructuous. Both the criminal writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged. [ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] ndm