Haribhau Pandit Dandgavhal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 6 ca 5647-20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 6 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5647 OF 2020 IN FAST/9087/2019 HARIBHAU PANDIT DANDGAVHAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. D. A. Bhide h/f Mr. V. B. Wayal AGP for Respondent NO.1-State: Mr. P. M. Kulkarni ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 12/06/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay 822 days, which appears to be caused due to his poor fnancial condition. 3.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. Acquiring body though served but remained absent. 4.

Therefore, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 822 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.

5.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-